Terug naar Encyclopedie
Arbeidsrecht

Serious Breach of Duty in Amsterdam: Summary Dismissal

Discover serious breach of duty as grounds for summary dismissal in Amsterdam: conditions, examples, and consequences. Including Court and Legal Aid Office info.

3 min leestijd

Serious Breach of Duty: Summary Dismissal in Amsterdam

Serious breach of duty constitutes a key ground for summary dismissal under Dutch employment law, particularly relevant for employers and employees in Amsterdam. This article explains what this concept entails, the legal basis, and the impact, including local institutions such as the District Court of Amsterdam (Parnassusweg 220) and the Legal Aid Office Amsterdam (Vijzelstraat 77).

What Does Serious Breach of Duty Mean?

According to Article 7:678 DCC, serious breach of duty is an urgent reason for immediate termination of the employment contract without notice period or transition payment. It concerns violations of employment obligations that make it unreasonable for the employer to continue the relationship. In Amsterdam cases, such as those at the District Court of Amsterdam, judges take local context into account, such as the dynamic work culture in sectors like finance and tech.

Core of Article 7:678 DCC

Paragraph 1 allows termination in case of urgent reasons; paragraph 2 defines these as circumstances that justify immediate cessation. For employers, these are employee faults; for employees, employer faults.

Strict Conditions

Judges, including those of the District Court of Amsterdam, assess:

1. Objective Seriousness

Assessed based on position, hierarchy, years of service, past performance, and company standards. In Amsterdam office roles, breach of trust weighs heavily.

2. Attributability

The employee must have recognized their conduct as unacceptable.

3. Causal Connection

Direct link between the act and the untenability.

4. Immediacy

Act 'forthwith' upon knowledge (paragraph 3), often within days, with room for investigation.

Typical Examples from Case Law

Theft

Even minor thefts break trust. HR 12 Feb 1999: €50 theft sufficed for warehouse employee.

Fraud

False claims or information qualify as urgent.

Violence

Aggression against colleagues or customers justifies dismissal, common in Amsterdam hospitality and retail cases.

Conflicts of Interest

Competing side jobs or information leaks, especially in creative hubs like Amsterdam.

Repeated Violations

Cumulative absenteeism after warnings, such as in cases of insubordination.

Consequences

For Employee

No benefit for first 3 months (WW), possible annulment of dismissal via subdistrict court within 2 months. Consult Legal Aid Office Amsterdam, Vijzelstraat 77 for free advice.

For Employer

Risk of repayment of wages and damages if dismissal invalid. Many cases proceed at District Court of Amsterdam, Parnassusweg 220.

Procedure

Written dismissal with facts; employee can litigate. In Amsterdam, fast hearings due to high caseload.

Tips for Amsterdam Employers

  • Document everything.
  • Investigate before action.
  • Consider mediation via local institutions.

Always consult an employment law attorney for specific cases.