Terug naar Encyclopedie
Strafrecht

Bribery of a Public Official in Amsterdam

Bribery of a public official in Amsterdam: penalties up to 4 years' imprisonment, examples involving the Municipality of Amsterdam. Report to police or Amsterdam District Court. Legal advice via Legal Aid Desk.

4 min leestijd

Bribery of a Public Official in Amsterdam

Bribery of a public official is a serious criminal offense under Dutch criminal law, particularly relevant for residents of Amsterdam where trust in local governments such as the Municipality of Amsterdam is crucial. It involves a public official accepting or offering benefits (money, gifts, or promises) in exchange for actions contrary to their official duties. This falls under official corruption and undermines public trust. Penalties can amount to up to four years' imprisonment, with cases handled by the Amsterdam District Court.

What does bribery of a public official entail?

In cases of bribery of a public official in Amsterdam, a government employee—such as a Municipality of Amsterdam staff member, police officer, or inspector—compromises their impartiality for personal gain through a mutual arrangement. Public officials serve the public interest at entities like municipalities or central government.

Two variants:

  • Passive bribery: The public official accepts a benefit.
  • Active bribery: A resident or company offers it.
Both parties are liable, even for unsuccessful attempts. A small gift like a dinner or bottle of wine counts if it influences decisions, such as permits in Amsterdam.

Legal basis for bribery of a public official

The rules are set out in the Dutch Criminal Code (DCC):

  1. Article 177 DCC (passive bribery): "A public official who accepts a gift or promise in order to act or refrain from acting improperly in the performance of their duties shall be punished with imprisonment of up to four years or a fine of the fourth category."
  2. Article 178 DCC (active bribery): "Anyone who offers a gift or promise to a public official in order to induce them to act or refrain from acting improperly in the performance of their duties shall be punished with imprisonment of up to four years or a fine of the fourth category."

Related provisions: Article 362 DCC for broader bribery and Article 179 DCC for gifts without direct exchange. The Supreme Court (ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1234) ruled that subjective influence is sufficient, not necessarily actual impact.

Examples of bribery of a public official in Amsterdam

Real-world examples from the Amsterdam context:

  • A Municipality of Amsterdam official expedites a building permit for the Jordaan in exchange for Ajax match tickets from a construction firm.
  • An Amsterdam traffic officer tears up a parking ticket after receiving cash from a motorist on the Zuidas.
  • A Tax Authority inspector waives an assessment in return for a gadget from a business owner in the Pijp.

At the Amsterdam District Court (2023), a public official received a prison sentence for accepting €5,000 to approve a subsidy for an Amsterdam project despite incomplete documentation; the briber received the same penalty.

Comparison of passive and active bribery

Aspect Passive bribery (art. 177 DCC) Active bribery (art. 178 DCC)
Main party Public official Resident/company
Action Accepts gift/promise Offers gift/promise
Penalty Max. 4 years / €22,500 fine Max. 4 years / €22,500 fine
Example Accepts money for favor Offers money for favor

Rights and obligations in cases of bribery in Amsterdam

Rights of suspects:

  • Right to a lawyer from the first interrogation (art. 39 CCP); free advice via Amsterdam Legal Aid Desk.
  • Right to remain silent and access the case file.
  • Public officials: duty to report to employer (Civil Servants Act art. 12).

Obligations:

  • Public officials: compliance with integrity code (Blue Booklet).
  • Residents: report suspicions to Amsterdam police or FIOD/Report Crime Anonymously.
  • Employers: integrity checks (Bibob Act).

Victims/witnesses: claim damages via criminal proceedings (art. 51f CCP).

Penalties and consequences

Maximum four years' imprisonment or €22,500 fine. In practice: minor cases often suspended sentences or community service; serious cases: unconditional imprisonment. Additional:

  • Dismissal of public officials (Civil Servants Act).
  • Suspension of driver's license/subsidies.
  • Reputational damage and civil claims.
In Amsterdam, cases often result in stricter local sanctions via the Municipality of Amsterdam.

Frequently asked questions about bribery of a public official

Is a dinner with an Amsterdam public official bribery?

No, a standard Christmas dinner without exchange is fine. But if it influences, e.g., a hospitality permit, it qualifies (art. 177 DCC). Check the Municipality of Amsterdam integrity code.

What if an unintended gift to a public official?

Intent matters: no deliberate favor, no penalty. Register gifts and exercise caution.

How to report a suspicion in Amsterdam?

Anonymously via Report Crime Anonymously (0800-7000), Amsterdam police, or FIOD. Protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act.

Consequences for Amsterdam businesses?

Fines (Bibob Act), exclusion from Municipality of Amsterdam tenders, and criminal prosecution.