Terug naar Encyclopedie

Composition and Independence of the Objection Committee in Amsterdam

The objection committee in Amsterdam must be independent with strict requirements on composition, as in Article 7:13 Awb. The chairperson and members have no ties to the municipal executive. Challenge possible in case of bias, with attention to local procedures.

2 min leestijd

Composition and Independence of the Objection Committee in Amsterdam

The objection committee of the municipality of Amsterdam meets strict requirements for independence, as laid down in Article 7:13 paragraph 2 of the Awb. The committee consists of a chairperson and two members, whereby the chairperson may not have any ties to the Amsterdam municipal executive or the municipal services. Members are appointed for a fixed period of four years to ensure continuity and stability in local administrative practice, fitting the scale of a large city like Amsterdam.

Requirements for Members in the Amsterdam Context

  • Independence: No employment relationship with the municipality of Amsterdam, such as with the Work and Income Department or Spatial Planning, and no conflicts of interest with local interest organizations.
  • Expertise: Legal knowledge of administrative law and specific expertise in Amsterdam themes such as housing construction, traffic or social affairs.
  • Neutrality: Obligation to objective assessment, without bias towards the Amsterdam executive board and aldermen or city districts.

Appointment Procedure in Amsterdam

Appointments are made through a transparent, public procedure by the Amsterdam executive board of mayor and aldermen, with input from the municipal council. Members may not simultaneously sit on other local advisory councils, such as the City Council for the Wmo. In case of suspected bias, a member may be challenged in accordance with Article 7:17 Awb. The municipality of Amsterdam checks independence annually through audits by the court of audit, which builds trust in procedures regarding objections about parking permits, social assistance or building plans.

Violations of these rules may lead to the nullity of opinions, as previously occurred in cases at the District Court of Amsterdam. This system promotes transparency and impartiality in Amsterdam administrative law proceedings, tailored to the diverse and complex local challenges.